The core of this project is established from the affair of due diligence over the past year and the preceding projected works. This conceptually weighted title took many different physical forms. Upon approach to this project came initial constrained direction. Which within M’s first mind meeting got shattered due to an irritated sensation similar to that you get when you see a white canvas with an accidental mark. Through the elimination of limitation within process, a new lease was determined. This was to assemble the otherwise scattered thoughts and posing questions that had been so influential or pronounced to M over the past year. The unconscious use of Socratic method and the ideology that within a Socratic circle there is no leader in conversation nor an answer, gave M justified confidence in her methodology. The use of Aristotle’s posing questions technique led him on to a constant absorption of dialogue, with not just others but more importantly himself. This technical value of dialogue M see’s vital in the production and result of her work (as demonstrated in the I/K/O/D project.) Therefore by applying this technique with the desire to tribute and physically collate her findings, she produced a rich reflection of process and action. She had no aim but possessed an inner urge to splash the quotes and think trains up the wall. To then have the ability to visualise what language and direction escalated from this process. This resulted in the birth of a wide body of work under this project title , but moreover a conceptual theory M eagerly investigated.
This can be read into further via the 'Critical study - The studies show a white space.' or 'Making something soft,hard' book.